Not the same at all.
At the risk of simply re-stating personal interpretations, it might be helpful to juxtapose the Missed Approach instructions for LTAI and EGJB.
Please bear with me...
Let's review, then delete the conditional distances from each.
Original Instructions on each approach plate:
LTAI ILS DME-1 36C:
MISSED APCH: Climb on R-330 AYT to 1250', then turn LEFT (not before D5.0 AYT)
climbing to 2700' proceed to VOR then TOPUZ and hold.
EGJB ILS/DME/VOR Rwy 09
----- After DELETING the conditional distances from each instruction -----
LTAI would read::
MISSED APCH: Climb on R-330 AYT to 1250', then turn LEFT,
climbing to 2700' proceed to VOR then TOPUZ and hold.
And EGJB would read:
Climb straight ahead to 1300, then climbing turn right to VOR GUR at 2000...
Are the similarities between the intentions of the procedure designers more apparent, now?