Excuse me guys... You quote passages where the author/speaker describes the behavior in normal law (i.e. the most common case), and under the pretext that it was not explicitly mentioned in each occurrence it was normal law, you cry foul?
Are you not able to tell the difference between a "commercial" speech and technical instructions?
We understood long ago you don't like what Airbus or Ziegler once said. Now what is the use of repetition? Do you intend to change your mind? Because so far, it is not a convincing speech.
Last edited by AlphaZuluRomeo; 12th June 2013 at 09:46.