I think the loss of both cowls should be kept in perspective. All eng cowls can detach from all aircraft if not properly closed. Any panel detaching from anywhere on an aircraft can cause unpredictable damage.
Eng cowls have long been seen as a weak point and so a second inspection by maintenance that they are in fact closed is pretty standard.
To miss both engines as in this case does perhaps suggest a more systematic failing in the system rather than an individual error or a design error.
British Airways has always been a leading airline and many will want to throw mud at it just for being there. That should not prevent justified criticism however.
Therefore and as they are a repeat offender I believe it is in everybody's interest to properly investigate and ensure that maintenance is being given proper funding and the respect it deserves.
And I will say again. If it should turn out that shortcomings are uncovered the CAA should be made to explain why they didn't uncover it.
Last edited by Safety Concerns; 4th Jun 2013 at 12:48.