How about Inspector General Hart?
Yes it is a good idea, in theory, to have an IGA (Inspector General Aviation for those who don't like acronyms or suspect that this is some kind of code language). But if the IGA is not a straight bat like say Mr Hart but is for a better term 'a government whore' then it won't work. We can see for example that the CAsA Board only serves the interest of the Minister and itself, it has been debated that the ICC only serves the interests of CAsA executives (just look at the ICC membership), the AAT is easily manipulated and only ends up serving the interests of CAsA. So the IGA will be an epic failure if it is aloud to be corrupted by powerful influences, sources of sorcery and sections of the GWM well known for its love of mates rates.
Only two choices here really, the scalp of the Mr Skull and Beaker will be taken and a light patch up job done to plaster over the rot, or a top to tail dismantling and rebuild will be done.
P.S ICAO were out here in AUS last week, anybody know what they were up to?