I'm sure your efforts to spin this will be creative, but the judges words speak for themselves.
I was very clear in what I was asking.
The claim made is very clear
"repeatedly proved to lie in court" are the words used.
As can be seen from what you posted this is NOTHING of the sort.
"The judge said that Mr O'Leary had misrepresented him in an 'offensive letter' he had written to Noel Dempsey. "
is NOT lying in court nor even close as since when does a letter go through court.
You have made something up and have nothing to back up the claim a single time much less repeatedly.