In the newspaper article at the start of this thread the response by a RYR spokesman was to say that the claims were 'false'. Crewlink also denied the allegations. It should be a simple black & white test for a 'learned friend' to analyse the facts and decide if indeed they are false. If it is found that the claims are true then it could be said that RYR, (& perhaps Crewlink) and who knows all the other agencies involved in the merry-go-round, are strange bed-fellow with the truth. At the moment an ex-crew member claims X, RYR claims it's false. It should be clearer than one word against another. The crew member has been called a liar. Whose is the next move?