All I can say for now is that Dick Garwood is no more responsible for the issues you're talking about that I am. Quite what his remit is in the job, I have no idea. Whether he is in a position to right past wrongs, not for me to say. What I do know is that he will do his duty, as he has always done, in a professional and reasonable way.
Quite what might be expacted of him in terms of challenging previous wrongs, again I do not know. All I was saying is that he is a good man for the job. His job now is to run the MAA in a professional and correct way. I'm sure he will do that. I doubt it is in his terms of reference to dig up past failings.
Sorry if I have you wrong.