CP# 1660 –"And what are the chances that it contains procedures for extracting statements through threats of regulatory action or violence, or for inventing convenient evidence and losing inconvenient evidence?"
I have to agree with Creamy;- the top of the mudguard is pristine and theoreticaly bullet proof; many many layers of protection and polish, buffed to a fare the well are maintained at great expense. The dirt of course is hidden underneath. But, as they say in the classics where there's muck, there's money.
This Senate Inquiry seems to be seeing through the 'muguard' gloss. Were all the correct procedures used to Wodger Dom James? (hint – No), was the prescribed, published and much vaunted CASA auditing system and the use of results followed to the letter ? (hint – No); then of course there is the original question – What, in all the hells happened with the report ?????
This why we are seeing the Senate committee working hundreds of man hours, (not to mention overtime used correcting Hansard), they are stripping back the protective layers and heading toward bare metal. We, the unwashed, illiterate, ills of society can only hope that the sane, logical voices of honest, qualified folk like Cook, Aherne, Davis and others are clearly heard over the braying and barking cacophony thrown up by the likes of McComic and his happy band.
The written system may well be an exemplar, but the way that system is perverted and manipulated to achieve whatever fate the gods decide for mortals is the stuff of legend. Remember the quote from that infamous email - 'stay on target'.
Pete rules – OK.....
