FD.
Stop taking the Pi**!
The first quote is in correct - I actually wrote (IR)RESPONSIBLE - to allow others to make their own decision.
The 2nd quote was in response to your post so not sure how you can link this to your earlier post as it came afterwards.
1. Where does any post state or show this wasn't illegal? Illegal or not bad press affects all of us flyers - read recent posts on the forum about how the press distort the truth to give flying a bad deal.
2. Sorry but the low temperature making a 'strip' usable begs belief! What if it had defrosted before the pilot arrived?
3. Still no details - whatever you presume. I could physical land a S61 in my garden but it would still be stupid and irresponsible of me.
4. READ THE POST OF HAIRYPLANE. Hoping for frost or having to wait for the ground to dry before it can leave! Hardly no problems or a suitable ground for a 'runway'! If there were no problems with the strip he could of left the same day if he wished.,
Did I ever mention neighbours opinions on noise?
Anti aviation types actually don't know or care what it is that lands near there home - most wouldn't known the difference between a 747 or 152 or S61 or R22 - its all 'intrusive' noise.
To be honest I really don't give a toss about where you can or can't land. If anything the reverse is the case - planks are jealous of how versatile and adaptable rotary aircraft are...
Get real - on the basis of the information provided by Hairyplane and the lack of denial of irresponsiblity from him, what other conclusion can a PROFESSIONAL aviator or the general public come to?