Some of the pruners posting here might do well to remind themselves that of the 6 incidents featured, 4 (2 airframe icicng, 1 fuel starvation and 1 incorrect runway) were a result of errors by the flightcrew ably (or not) assisted by people on the ground. Each of these incidents resulted in fatalities, so don't trivialise the issue.
It is useful to remember just how easy it is to get complacent and make a mistake which puts lives at risk, and in those circumstances I think the public and the media are perfectly justified in making a great deal of fuss. It would be nice however to see it all reported factually.
The programme was pretty well put together. No random talking heads trying to analyse everything, just the people involved telling it how it was for them. It was left to the viewer to draw their own conclusions. The simulations were perhaps a little sensationalist as this was not a programme analysing how the crash occurred, but at least we avoided all the worst elements of crazed voiceovers, hysterical exagerations of fact and sheer speculation along with scenes of dead bodies lying in fields or being carted away by emergency workers.
It's a sad fact that this is sometimes what happens in the industry, but if people use the opportunity of such a programme to remind themselves of the consequences of getting it wrong, then perhaps we can see it as a positive thing.