Originally Posted by jcjeant
I wonder why there was so much noise around this accident ..
Mostly made by those handicapped by inability to understand the circumstances leading to it. Why do they feel the need to parade their ignorance is beyond my powers of understanding.
Originally Posted by jcjeant
why procedures were reviewed
To improve them. Something that happens when old ones are discovered lacking. Usually we don't need crash to do it, incidents serve as reminder well enough. Now for sciolists: there were crews who ignored stall warning as spurious and kept the attitude; there were crews that pulled but quickly reverted to push when warning went off. AF447 was the only one that both pulled and ignored stall warning and in that matter it was unique among the A330 crews but not among other crews flying "classic controls" aircraft who performed such a feat before them.
Originally Posted by jcjeant
Empowering censorship (because it is one of the powers of the BEA) may appear plausible for some case
Do you care to provide reference to your interesting viewpoint or you'd rather have us believe you because you said so?
Originally Posted by jcjeant
Nevertheless we will never know the justifications for censoring
Probable cause: imagination running wild.