Originally Posted by
kalavo
If someone was convicted of murder and he was found not guilty, to even arrest him again there needs to be a significant amount of new evidence that takes potentially years to gather.
I agree with most of your vibe, but the analogy still doesn't hold, because BA was found guilty. For us the unanswered question is: 'to what amount' and is it acceptable risk to let is continue (or rot), and is the behaviour recidivistic.
Until the evidence is revealed, we can keep talking about it forever drawing up analogies that probably don't apply. I can't wait.