PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Forces' productivity
View Single Post
Old 10th Mar 2013, 11:07
  #17 (permalink)  
Roland Pulfrew
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Fatter Gator

The only problem with more FTRS is that we have singularly failed in a number of areas to recruit our quota of FTRS personnel. There is a naive belief in certain political circles that reserves are the cheap answer, but we often fail to recruit the required numbers. As a simple example the 3 elementary flying training squadrons were supposed to be manned with 50-60% FTRS. The assumption (unsubstantiated) was that recruiting personnel leaving at 38/16 in the normal QFI rich areas around Links/Yorks would be easy, missing the obvious point that those leaving at 38/16 are generally off to airline jobs. Unfortunately we never made the required FTRS recruits meaning that the regular air force had to backfill. The same is/was true of recruiting SRs around the Brize area for Voyager.

For those that haven't caught up (and I include Dr Redford in this), the latest version of Defence Strategic Direction has changed the harmony rates for the RAF and Army to much closer to the RN figures.

As I mentioned on one of the other topics relating to retired RN officers writing to the "broadsheets", expect more of this divide and conquer tactic in the run up to SDSR.
Roland Pulfrew is offline