PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - FAA Grounds 787s
View Single Post
Old 9th March 2013 | 23:54
  #1211 (permalink)  
JohnMcGhie
10 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 1
From: Australia
They almost fried the Flight Control Battery

@Turin:

My greater concern is not that these batteries catch fire, but that they fail! On a fly-by-wire aircraft, that gives a whole new meaning to the term "dead stick". Yes, I know almost everything else has to fail before this matters. But consider Sully's celebrated ditching:

He lost both engines. His APU was not running. If his batteries had failed, and his aircraft had been a 787, he would have had no flight controls. At all.
The 787 also has individual back up batteries for the three ACEs (Actuator Control Electronics-part of the fly by wire system) they are also Li-Ion. The 777 is similar.
According to Ben Sandilands, they nearly fried the Flight Control backup battery as well:Dreamliner crisis: JAL 787 was at risk of 2nd battery fire | Plane Talking

The Firebox would seem like a good idea, essential in my opinion, if you want to fly Li-Ion batteries.

But as I said before, my problem with Li-Ion batteries is not that they catch fire, but that they fail. I don't think Lithium Ion batteries are sufficiently reliable for safety-critical aviation service.

Cheers
JohnMcGhie is offline  
Reply