Is that an interpretation or (backed by) Part-FCL?
I'm asking since Part-FCL is quite specific in other areas about what it deems acceptable training providers for licenses or ratings (i.e., ATOs), but FCL.710 only mentions "differences training" by an "instructor".
The 2-year recency rule you mention seems to not hold for tailwheel aircraft due to FCL.710(b), at least for SEP ones.
Best,
George
Last edited by Zonkor; 3rd Mar 2013 at 23:09.