PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - FAA Grounds 787s
View Single Post
Old 28th Feb 2013, 07:54
  #1059 (permalink)  
Pub User
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Grobelling through the murk to the sunshine above.
Age: 60
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
poorjohn

even after two fires and an OAG (sic) fleet the best way forward is still to leave everything as unchanged as possible, and put a steel box around it.
I think there's a lot more involved in the proposed modification than just putting a box around it. There is talk of cell re-design and battery modification to isolate cells thermally.

Walnut

so with a double engine failure it is essential to start the APU, (from the battery)? I appreciate the windmilling engines should provide some output of both electrical & hydraulics but again the pilot is faced with pressurisation problems
The 787 starts the APU automatically in the case of a double engine failure, yes from the battery, but it would be assisted by windmilling engines and the RAT.

The pressurisation problems are no worse than any other twin when faced with a double engine failure. You're going down anyway, so the most important action for loss of pressurisation is already initiated!
Pub User is offline