Cream puff, not one bit of evidence in the Hutson case was tested in court.
The argument in court about the pleadings
assumes every bit of evidence that Mr Butson would have given was absolutely true. That's the point. Even if all of his evidence was accepted as true, it would have made
no difference to the outcome.
the argument that CASA made was not that it did any of the things that Butson alleged, but that Butson had no right to complain abou.t ANYTHING CASA did.
Rubbish. CASA's argument was that Mr Butson and anyone else can complain about everything and anything, but none of his complaints disclosed a cause of action against CASA or its officers.
...And the Judge agreed, making CASA judge jury and executioner with no right of appeal.
No. The judge agreed that none of Mr Butson's complaints disclosed a cause of action against CASA or its officers, even if the facts asserted by Mr Butson were assumed to be true.
But you should be whinging to the federal court judge who made the decision, and the three federal court judge who agreed with that decision. Have you done that, or will you continue to have a pointless argument about it on PPRuNe?