Ok,
this seems to have drifted a lil bit.
Like all things legal, some of the documents supplied are a lil hard on the eyeballs, unless suitably 'endorsed'
2 simple questions......
1. Judge said "nothing to see here get on with business" ?
2. CASA said next day, "lots to see, you're grounded again" ?
If the answer to both, is yes, then surely a criminal act has been committed by the 'regulator' There are laws against double jeopardy in this country FFS!
Given the way i read the judges comments, the regulator should be working with the operator to get them airborne again. One wouldn't expect that to be an instantaneous process, however, one would expect a guvmint entity to be proactive in encouraging business activity under its control
I digress.......