PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Design review for 787 and “Plan B” for A350 XWB triggered by Lithium ion batteries
Old 20th Feb 2013, 17:00
  #27 (permalink)  
RR_NDB
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Nearby SBBR and SDAM
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where is the valve* of the battery case? The battery case was sealed?

Hi,

Kiskaloo:

In the case of JA804A (NH), electrolyte that reached the bottom of the EE bay was vented out of the plane (via either the outflow valve or a drain valve - I am not sure which). This is the brown streak visible on the underside of the fuselage. The airflow cooled the material before it could do any real damage to the CFRP of the fuselage. This would also be the case with a controlled vent directly from the battery container.


no-hoper:

All main,apu or emergency batteries (NiCad) on Airbus and ATR aircraft are vented outboard due to gaseous fumes produced by the battery during charging.
A battery "breaths" and venting is normally used. The case of the 787 battery was designed, i suspect, with some assumptions like:

Cell will not heat

Venting is not required

And also there is a VERY STRANGE POINT (to be confirmed):

Each cell has it´s own valve (hole near plus terminal as posted earlier).

Where is the valve of the battery case?

(*) By valve i mean a hole where breathing of cells can pass through. A pressure gas passage.
RR_NDB is offline