"FW: Response to Roger".
Problem: Roger Fitzpatrick or Patrick Fitzroger. Which Woger wuz it?.
The Woger of "The Report" fame, is a lion of reform, robustly using cohorts of fearless FOI to drill down below the conflicted, scratched surfaces. Sorting the incompetent from the dopey and reflecting "CASA concern". Obviously seriously qualified as "He, who must not be named" singled him out from all of his other 'experts' to draft a secret "How to fix it" report.
The Woger of "audit management fame" has previously, under oath claimed to be no more than a simple paper shuffler at the mercy of technically qualified inspectors; some of whom told fairy stories, which Woger believed. It was unfortunate that whatever a qualified field inspector told him, he a simple paperwork shuffler, was obliged to believe, no matter how dubious or worthless the information was. "Not qualified M' lud".
Now it can't be the same chappie, that would imply complicity, or lying on oath or a seriously split personality. No!, and then, the difficulty identifying the wight "Woger" is further compounded by the inappropriate use of large words, complicated syntax and long sentences which appear to finish where they start, without actually saying anything. The available candidates for "Woger" all seem to fancy themselves with a pen.
Aye, 'tis all passing strange; a puzzle. Will the weel Woger wiggle out from the wood work? Tonight, the Bar Room Barristers have convened a special information swap night, with a guest speaker; perhaps they can determine just who's bweifs Woger was pulling.
Insert - standard "Kelpie" ending.
Last edited by Kharon; 19th Feb 2013 at 19:13.
Reason: Wotten key board is wooted.