PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - FAA Grounds 787s
View Single Post
Old 17th Feb 2013, 06:58
  #843 (permalink)  
pax2908
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: FR
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps somebody who knows could explain (or maybe I missed this) why it was so difficult to have another option open for the batt chemistry. Presumably they became committed to Li-Ion very early in the design? I somehow understood the structural aspect (design of EE bay layout, support structure...) but I find it hard to believe the associated risk was not considered. Regardless of what actually caused the incidents that led to the current situation.
pax2908 is offline