PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - FAA Grounds 787s
View Single Post
Old 14th Feb 2013, 20:24
  #810 (permalink)  
peter we
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london,uk
Posts: 735
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Working backward, FAA accepted a single cell would not cause propagation (further runaway). So the assumption is BOEING designed, built, and tested a platform that demonstrated this to the satisfaction of BOEING. And to FAA.
The battery failed the real world test.
So working backwards, Boeing did not test it for certification, unless they deliberately introduced a battery with known design flaws and covered it up.

2) The problem to isolate a defective cell is: You need a costly relay and you reduce the voltage of the battery. Itīs not practical.
Sorry, thats bull****. The individual cells are monitored and isolated if defective, they have to be. A relay costs a few dollars in a $16k battery FFS.

Last edited by peter we; 14th Feb 2013 at 20:30.
peter we is offline