An enquiry would explain what happened and why it happened. Why it would reach any different conclusions to the 2005 enquiry, I'm not clear. It would not invalidate the legally binding contracts that were agreed between the various parties so please explain how you go from 'enquiry' to Peel being mandated to hand the site back or reopen it as an airport. That would need action through the courts, to which the questions are
- who would fund the legal costs
- who exactly is being taken to court?