Not so simple maintenance
As a further input into the view that this is not going to be the escape from EASA that light GA is looking for, I have it on good authority that the CI maintenance regime will be based on a validation of 145 approval.
As I expect most light GA on the N is being signed off by an A&P and an IA (a situation that is unlikely to change with the current TSA block on new FAR 145 approvals) and on the G is being signed off by an engineer under Part M, your CI reg might need a higher "standard" of maintenance approval that now required if the CI look for validating organisations rather than engineers.
Looking more and more like a clone of the IOM idea.
Last edited by Bob Upanddown; 14th February 2013 at 12:40.