PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - R22 MR Temp Light Inoperative - legal to fly?
Old 11th February 2013 | 18:42
  #1 (permalink)  
JB77UK
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Bend, OR
Question R22 MR Temp Light Inoperative - legal to fly?

Hi and thank you all for any feedback.

I know the practical answer to this - "I wouldn't fly with a MR Temp light inoperative", but what is the position regarding regulations?

Firstly I would check the day VFR required equipment (91.205) - and the MR Temp Light is not on that list. So now I go to inoperative equipment 91.213(d) and this is where it gets a bit less clear to me. It seems to say that as long as the instrument/equipment is not required for day VFR (91.205), not "Indicated as required on the aircraft's equipment list" (the R22 POH?) and the aircraft doesn't have a MEL then it is OK to fly without the equipment being operational - as long as the pilot removes/placards (remove the bulb?) and doesn't consider it a hazard to safe flight (which is subjective).

I would conclude that legally, if it was a short flight maybe to a repair facility, you could legally fly with the MR Temp Light pulled (that is my version of removed/placarded). What do you guys think - legally?

I want to know because I want to make sure I tell my students the correct thing. And this issue doesn't just apply to the MR Temp light, what about other equipment/instruments not on the day VFR or POH lists of required equipment? (Heater, Carbon Monoxide light, VSI, etc).

Like I said the practical advice for this example would be "call the mechanics/don't fly etc" but I would appreciate some clarification on the legal issue.

Many thanks

Jay
JB77UK is offline  
Reply