I see that unlike the freedom of speech practiced by Pprune the sitting members of the AWAL board have come out in a rather abrupt rebuttal of the recent criticisms of P132 but have offered no real explanatory material relying solely on the premise each of us can contact CASA and get private briefings or attend a soiree this weekend and listen to a CASA officer try to explain the ramifications of Part 132 .
This ignores the factual position of what is written in the draft, what is on the paper is the position, legal interpretation relies on what is written, not opinions, it is up to each of us to become properly informed and not rely on platitudes.
Provided this debate stays apersonal and is not a slanging match it will remain on Pprune where all can judge for themselves what the actual position is.