There is no editing here. Good, and Bad....
That might mean you are deluged with too much Lyman and not enough
Machaca.
But I am increasingly agitated about the appearance of generic media here, as if some new thing will be known in its reading.
Baloney.
This article could have been a simple rewrite of any of several pages to be found here, on PPRuNe.
Example (from no less than Harvard
) And NOT FOUND ON PPRuNe until now:
"Similarly, being integrated means you don't have to understand what all the interdependencies are going to be between the components in a product that you haven't created yet (which, obviously, is pretty hard to do). And, as a result of that, you don't need to ask suppliers to contract over interconnects that haven't been created yet, either".
UTTER and complete nonsense.....dangerous nonsense And part of the problem that has been discussed here at length.
It is exactly the opposite of good design.
Did someone pay Harvard to publish that propaganda? Because it is a perfect fit with other nonsense that prepares for a total misunderstanding of the problems by the public.
And exonerates Boeing, ultimately, from responsibility to what should be its core Mission: GOOD DESIGN....