We are not here talking about GEP - much as you would like to "Richard Westnott" Reading your posts you have a clear agenda.
I do read Forums, but as a rule of thumb I don't respond and don't post. This subject is close to my heart - it my family that have been affected.
You appear to have missed the Live Feed from Oxford Crown Court which listed the matter. You have have also missed the twitter account for the Court. Had you seen that then you would have known that Alexander went before the Judge at 10.43 and the next case started at 11.13. So it can be concluded that the guilty plea was dealt with in less than 30 minutes, including sentence.
In the original hearing the Judge ordered that Alexander would not be allowed to work with Children for the rest of his life. Plain and simple.
No after mention that the "Police would need to give permission" (to overturn the Judges order).
In my experience I have never heard a Judge make a statement such as the one claimed by EVS - AND fine someone £3500 plus £1000 costs
in passing sentence the Judge said was far too widely drawn and needed amendi
Both the CPS and the Court confirmed to me on Friday before I made my post that the matter is no longer subject to reporting restrictions with respect to Alexander. However common sense prevails and no one wants to identify the children, as such I have not been specific about the church.
I sat in the public gallery last year and listened to a pre-trial hearing of Alexander and at that stage both issues were being dealt with together. They were later separated into two trials.
How can entering plea a few days before a trial be classed as "coming clean"?
The whole sorrid affair has taken over a year and could have been concluded last year had Alexander placed his guilty plea then.