I apologize, and thanks for the reply. I wish I hadn't been such a stubborn fool, I am starting to get what the inventor had in mind, and it intrigues me.
Thank you sir,
One last question CliveL?
I promise to stay away from primary flow. My picture is of two discrete zones, bound by streamline, in the nozzle? One, the primary, a circular section, bounded by a ring of secondary flow adjacent the Nozzle liner?
If they are discrete, and do not mix, can we call the secondary flow Ram Effect?
Also, since there is no fuel added to the Ram effect, and therefore no Ignition, can we actually call it a RamJet, partial or otherwise? If CliveL is busy, peter kent, can you help?
Last edited by Lyman; 1st Feb 2013 at 19:22.