But it was not a "turbo-ramjet"
Of course you are entitled to an opinion, but that doesn't make you correct.
In the adoption of the position that the engine featured no "ramjet" function, you need to explain,
Why Kelly Johnson, the aircrafts designer, refers to "ramjet"
Why the aircrafts pilots refer to "ramjet"
Why the aircrafts instructors refer to "ramjet"
Why the P & W engineer assigned to oversee the in service use of the engine refers to "ramjet"
Why the people assigned to command the operation of the aircraft refer to "ramjet"
Were all these people so stupid that they didn't know what they were talking about?