PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - M/T Ejector racks - why doesn't the RAF use them?
Old 30th Jan 2013, 19:13
  #12 (permalink)  
Whisky_Ffox
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Building 12
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reason UK went for CBTE, not M/TER, was the same reason as installing the Spey rather than the original J79: UK content, in addition to the slight change in geometry of the shoulder stations. That from the Phantom Weaps School Chiefy of the time, one Dougie H*****stall.

CBTE - Carrier B*mb, Triple Ejector

if GR1 had had two MER fitted on the belly pylons, and each filled with 6 BL755, would performance have taken a real hit?
The Load Teams would have had to put the aircraft - Tornado GR1 - on jacks if the lower station of the CBTE had been loaded, indeed I doubt there would have been enough clearance underneath as the CBTE's were fitted fully loaded and the Handling and Loading Cradle ironwork added quite a few inches under the lower store.

Last edited by Whisky_Ffox; 30th Jan 2013 at 19:29. Reason: ...follows another post still awaiting attention from the 'moderation' gents
Whisky_Ffox is offline