Look
I am not an expert on the explosion patterns of missiles but I know enough engineering and physics to know that the report EMIT links to makes a sound point. If a missile shot down the plane there has to be some evidence of it. What was this? The magical invisible exploding missile? I don't think so. The comments about the military and radar tapes and stuff is crap, red herrings. Accident investigators aren't called upon to explain the motives of third parties. They follow the evidence. If a missile shot down this plane there had to be some physical evidence in the debris. It's as simple as that.