I think both of you resigned from the AWAL Board "under clouds".
nonosense,
How well self-named.
In short, re. the people you think you are referring to, the short answer is no. One resigned due severe health problems, the other didn't resign at all, just called it quits after something like 15 years on the AWAL board, simply declining to nominate for another term. There are, undoubtedly, times when enough is enough.
You would be well advised to check the facts, and not rely on some very erroneous and defamatory emails being circulated by partisan individuals, or the equally partisan phone campaign under way.
The coffers of AWAL are lighter by some $50,000+ give or take, as a result of non-compliance with the Corporations Act 2001,and due to the silliness that is going on.
Not a good result for the poor old members who have, so far as I can see, not even been told about the court case, right up to the Dispatch delivered in the last few hours, let alone what it has cost them.
It also looks like the company itself (AWAL is legally a public company) is campaigning in the lead-up to the resumed AGM, if this is so, this is also a serious breach of the Corporations Act 2001.
Time for a new board, with board members who actually understand about their legal responsibilities as directors of a public company.
Tootle pip!!