bsieker (bernd).....
Thanks for clearing that up. It is nice to be able to share the "uninformed" yoke of criticism....
The irony is instructive, for there must be a balance among progress, risk, innovation, and SAFETY.
It is by no mistake that our Supreme Court has labelled a CORPORATION as having the attributes of an "individual".
EGO, GREED, AGGRESSION, etc. They belong in the Boardroom, not on the floor, or in the "discussions" between Airframer and Regulator.
Every bit as important as the technical, is the procedural.....
Corporations invest other people's money, to put at risk other people's lives.....
And collect the benefits therefrom. Without imbalance, there is no progress.
Without Delta, there is no velocity. Herein is a tutorial for those who wish to see it.
I am a betting man. And my money is on the FAA.
Hell hath no fury like a bureaucrat, shamed...
Relative to ops, and maintenance. This area was presented early on, and got some criticism.... The airframer has an obligation to support its product in the field. Whether Battery, or Controls system, "sink or swim" won't 'Fly'.
Last edited by Lyman; 29th January 2013 at 14:18.