The acceptable level of risk is one in a billion flight hours, not one in 25,000
Define what you mean by "risk"
I have yet to see what evidence applies in this case to the level of risk (either regulated by statue or to somebody's concept of safety).
All this re-quoting of the Special Condition is meaningless and pedantic unless expert assessments follow of what paragraphs were not met. In the end the means to unground will be made by corrective actions that bring it back into specific paragraph compliance and/or equivalent safety actions.
Neither the completion of these assessments has been made nor the proposed means of compliance, This then is the thorn that produces the delay and feeds the rampant uneducated discussions on the internet boards