PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - FAA Grounds 787s
View Single Post
Old 21st January 2013 | 21:09
  #266 (permalink)  
grebllaw123d
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
DozyWannabe,

You wrote:

"Obviously, being a relatively new technology as far as aviation use is concerned, some of these requirements will probably need to be tightened as more real-world use cases highlight potential issues."

You are so right - I would even omit "probably"!

You then say that other battery technologies cannot supply enough juice required for the systems.
This is not quite correct.

An example:
On the A340 we had 2 main batteries (NiCd as far as I remember) each with 37 Ah - makes a total of 74 Ah. The Boeing 787 has 1 main battery with 65 Ah.
We had an APU battery with 37 Ah - the BOEING 787 uses the same APU battery as the main battery, i.e. 65 Ah - quite a big battery just for APU starting and a few lights.

So enough power with the "old" battery tecnology, but with penalties in space and weight - double up I guess.
grebllaw123d is offline  
Reply