but was removed by the mods
I don't know what the history is here as the thread has been moved to this forum.
One of our concerns, always, is that we deal fairly in respect of identification of individuals and organisations.
Generally, if a report clearly is in the public domain, reference to it can stand.
However, little is to be gained by identifying individuals and organisations in this forum as the interest ought to be in the problem - ie the old consideration of playing the ball, not the player.
My thought is that, unless an identification is necessarily pertinent to the discussion of the problem, we can do without it ..