Originally Posted by
davidash
When one reflects on the concerns and of Airbus that were expressed on this website with the teething problems on the 388, it begs the question why the grounding of the Japanese 788 fleets and the FAA review of the aircraft has elicited such a subdued response.
The A388 issues (thus far) don't constitute a fire risk, that's the difference.
Even the most partisan of people in the A v B debate (of which, in spite of reputation, I am not) are likely to recognise that.