PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - New Falklands War Brewing
View Single Post
Old 13th Jan 2013, 12:44
  #1058 (permalink)  
SASless
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
Falklands could not be held against Argentina'
02 April 2012

Britain's armed forces would struggle to defend, reinforce or retake the Falkland Islands if Argentina invaded again, a defence pressure group has warned.

A report from the UK National Defence Association (UKNDA) said defence cuts had placed the territories at greater risk than they had been since the 1982 invasion.

It warned that the islands' coastline could not be defended from an invasion and that Argentina could use almost all of its armed forces to invade at a time when the British forces consisted of "just four Typhoons, a Type-45 Destroyer, and Rapier short range missiles around Mount Pleasant airfield".

The UKNDA argued that Britain would not be able to deploy reinforcements in time and that forces stationed on the Falkland Islands would "necessarily have to hold Mount Pleasant airfield and its environs for a week before help arrived".

The pressure group said an amphibious assault would be required to retake the islands and that 112 British ships were needed in 1982. But it said this number could not be raised now with amphibious warfare capabilities "dramatically reduced", and a "considerably smaller" Royal Navy.

"There would be no fighter cover for the landing force and shipping," their report said. "There is no carrier… There is no question of providing air support using RAF fighters. There are no bases within range. In-flight re-fuelling, given the number of re-fuels required for a round trip of 8,000 miles from Ascension, would be impossible in the face of the threat posed by the Argentine air force."

But Brigadier Bill Aldridge, commander of British Forces in the Falklands reportedly said he was "entirely confident" he could "do the job that is required".

A Ministry of Defence spokesman told the Press Association there was no evidence of "any current credible military threat to the Falkland Islands".

"Unlike in 1982, we have a well defended airfield in the Falklands with ground-based air defences, and continue to have the ability to reinforce by air and sea," the spokesman said.

"People should be reassured by the contingencies that we now have in place compared to 30 years ago."

Almost sounds like Singapore of old in concept. In those days the guns pointed towards the Sea....and today the guns protect an airfield.
SASless is offline