http://www.pprune.org/military-aircr...ml#post7603017
&
http://www.pprune.org/military-aircr...ml#post7603059
1st Sea Lord reply to the RUSI 'Parry Paper':
Defence in the Media: 7 January 2013
Defence News: Defence in the Media: 7 January 2013
First Sea Lord's letter in the Sunday Times
Under the headline 'Fit for Purpose', a letter in the Sunday Times from the First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope responded to criticism of Carrier Strike by Rear Admiral Chris Parry.
The published letter read:
"Far from being 'unfit for sea battle', the Queen Elizabeth Class carriers will be the largest ships the Royal Navy has ever operated, launching the most advanced fifth-generation stealth fighter available ('Dinky toy carriers unfit for sea battle', last week). Jet-to-jet mid-air refuelling is not a requirement for our operations and is not necessary [to 'attack targets at long range or carry heavier bomb loads']. The carriers will be able to operate within strike range of the vast majority of nations and, in extremis, in conjunction with both UK and coalition air-to-air refuelling aircraft, would be able to support longer range strike missions as required."
The full version of the First Sea Lord's letter also included the following:
"The idea of adding further expense with a jet-to-jet refuelling variant of the Lightning for such a limited payload advantage at this stage of the project is misguided and would simply reduce the number of strike jets available. It is now important that the wider Defence community follows the example of the Service Chiefs in acknowledging the huge success that has been achieved to develop the carrier and jet programmes so far and by working together ensure we maximise and exploit the considerable investment and future potential of both. I am confident we will deliver a world-class Carrier Strike and Littoral Manoeuvre capability."