Originally Posted by Aerlingus231
That 1100 is a misrepresentation, that was the leave and return scheme, 750 of those people were re-hired but on lower terms and conditions as part of the Greenfield plan. So the actual redundancies were closer to 350.
So in an debate about Aer Lingus having better working conditions than Ryanair, you're defending Aer Lingus for making 750 staff redundant and rehiring them on lower pay & conditions just because they didn't sack them altogether?
Oh the irony...
And if you want to talk about job security, you don't see Ryanair staff threatening industrial action every 6 months and forcing passengers to cancel their bookings at a massive inconvenience. What does this do for the security of jobs?