Originally Posted by Clandestino
If one is not seriously involved in the business of confirmation bias then one is obliged to recognize that not only such a system can counter unreasonable command but that it was a main reason why it was developed in the first place.
Works just great as long as data in are sane.
If one + the Manufacturer are not seriously involved in the business of confirmation bias then one + the same Manufacturer are obliged to recognize that such a system can produce nonsense that reasonable command could not counter ... but such eventuality was simply not foreseen in the first place.
If the aroplane's attitude doesn't follow your sustained input, you are in much, much bigger trouble than simple FC mode change.
But nice to see we do finally agree ... Time now to tell Airbus how to minimize the risk.