The point I'm trying to make to Keejes His Dudeness is that aggression needs to be resisted. And yes, in 1940 the Dutch did have options - resist or surrender, die on your feet or live on your knees. They opted to live on their knees.
Oh, and in 1940 the Germans also outnumbered the British, and at the start of the Battle of Britain the Luftwaffe outnumbered the RAF. Indeed, on paper it was "hardly a match."
Using your logic should the British have also surrendered?