AAR you are so wrong in what you say about AOAC and pretty much everything else you rambled on about.
AOAC was paid for by the HKAOA funds as was AOAA. Whoever is feeding you this rubbish has an agenda, or is it you?
The HKAOA never tried to stop the AOAC getting registered at all, that happened quite early in the piece. What the HKAOA tried to stop, was AOAC ignoring basically every agreement they made with the "Federation" just to suit their own needs, in some cases it was pointed out they were signing inferior contracts. This did not stop them and they decided they wanted to make their own decisions,once their contract was closed, you could not open it unless both sides agreed. One of the reasons the HKAOA paid all this money was it felt it could benefit from bargaining rights from the on shored unions. This theory is fine if that union wants to play ball, AOAC had other ideas!
AOAA have not had to start again although there were many mistakes made along the way, but AOAA (as well as AOAC did) have been duly paying back what they can.
The whole on shoring process as you call it, was very messy but it is unprecedented in aviation union history so maybe you can cut the HKAOA some slack in trying to keep up with the company's decision to onshore.