nope
that's just how russian "unbiased and professional" media works.
They basically gather some info which they think makes sense but usually it is complete crap due to the fact that they have no knowledge of the aviation topic in particular and no technical knowledge in general. None.
The only thing they usually get right is - type of AC and place where it landed + casualties if any)
Instead initial reports about other details contain lots of cliches and most of the time are controversial and wrong. (like engines were on fire...second attempt (instead of second turn) and so on)
And it seems they don't even bother to ask professionals before let the info out.
Nothing new here.
