737..
Well, that is also the case...most missed approach procedures are along the lines of straight ahead until 2500 or such...I would not get involved unless it didnt really really work, but the people loading up the ac will look at all of these factors for the destination airport anyways...
. As stated before, the criteria does not address EO missed, so one has to rely on 3rd party developers to sort out performance issues.
Think of the public missed...you have 737's out there with 20K engines, all the bleeds, MLW, and its 90 degrees out...then go EO....
My perspective is from RNP procedures, which must take into account the worst case setting for the aircraft, and typically the missed procedure for EO is the straight section, then the all engine missed has the turns...
That is why there are very specific procedures for different variants of the 737 family and many of those will not work with the A320 family.
Get calls all the time, especially from AUS, when the temperatures get high, and they dont want to limit weights...
The EO missed procedures with turns, if needed, would then result in an astronomical DA, temperature limits or weight limits.
Last edited by FlightPathOBN; 27th Dec 2012 at 22:00.