PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - House of Commons Defence Committee Report on Maritime Airborne Surveillance
Old 23rd Dec 2012, 18:30
  #15 (permalink)  
Roadster280
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How much of the "not working" was actually true?

They had built several of the early airframes, and had been testing them for years, so I find it hard to believe that the basic airframe had too much wrong with it.

On the mission system, again they had been building it and testing it for years. So even if not quite all the I's were dotted and T's crossed, they had some semblance of an MPA.

Could it not have been brought into service in a limited manner and then modded with the bits that were not yet up to speed? C130J was quite limited when it came into service. Not aircraft, but another big equipment program, Ptarmigan, the equipment that went out of service a year or two back was a very different beast to the one introduced 20 years previously in terms of capability.

Or were the issues too fundamental to do even that?
Roadster280 is offline