TC
I think he is after data for " don't fly there its too dangerous". Before I retired there was a lot of discussion ref DACON nets used by the standby boats to pick up survivors in the water. I don't know what the state of play is with them now but there was discussion that in fairly moderate sea states they would do more damage to the survivor than was good for them!! The idea was put forward that if that was the only form of rescue available then flying should cease if the sea state got too high.
In todays risk averse society there is a tendency for risk to be assesed too highly and therefore thou shall not put yourself, or others, into that area of risk.
I remember flying back into Aberdeen, on an offshore based aircraft, to hear on the company frequency aircraft being recalled after taxing from the stand. I landed and wandered up to the ops room to see if our urgent freight had arrived. All the pilots and management were crowded round a computer screen looking at the weather info showing "lightening strikes". They had been recalled because of a threat of lightening! I had flown 120miles in CAVOK conditions with not a sight of a thunderhead yet they were all grounded because of a perceived threat - risk management gone mad.
HF