yeah dobbin1,
The thing is though, LAPL is controlled by EASA regulations, but the cad is not easa approved, i see they have it on the caa website as an alternative, but its not approved by EASA.
I still believe that the reason for the lower pass on the ishihara is because it tying in with the ICAO standards that are lower than the test its self, let not forget that EASA is not ICAO compliant. The colour vision test that are used are based on brightness, and not recignition, ie a light gun test is a bright red.green.white..
your LAPL medical is based on GP desision to fly, and not by CAA, this is the reason that caa issued an amendment gardening night vrf regualtions, becuase suspect that the amount of LAPL night application will increase..
whose of you like myself that are deemed cp2 by acheiveing 13/15 plates, but are colour normal, but deemed colour unsafe.. utter sh**