CP for a moment there I was believing your approach to comment to be favoring impartiality but goes to show how wrong one can be. The CASA indoctrination may nev wash off. It's difficult to unlearn, old habits et al.
Creampuff
*
CASA’s job has always been to regulate for safety.
When, precisely, has CASA ever made a decision based only on the commercial consequences of the decision?
1/ Interesting question! Yes you and I know that, but does CASA.
2/ I believe that there would be many cases out there where CASA operatives have assisted mates to the commercial detriment of another by using some spurious excuse for prosecution. I can identify one FOI who approached students and suggested they go to another school! No safety issues!
As to it being the sole purpose? Hard to prove without ALL the facts. I think Ord River Air Charter may be one such case. When my matter is published you may change your mind on intent. apart from the Clinton McKenzie policy document there was no basis for prosecution, internal emails will reveal all! So that will be your one event I can prove. Just be patient